Tooth Bone vs Tissue Bone MSE Does it matter? Beom Kim. AAO June 2021. Episode 120

Play episode
Hosted by
Farooq Ahmed

Tooth Bone vs Tissue Bone MSE Does it matter? Beom Kim


Reasons for Bone borne expansion

·      Opening mid-palatal suture in adults

·      Success OVERALL 74-90%

o   Study of success rates of palatal suture opening depending on age Oliveiera 2021

§  15-19 82%

§  20-29 82%

§  30-37 20%


Challenge – older male patients


Conventional RME in adults – risks

·      Periodontal problems

·      Severe tipping

·      Root resorption


Types of skeletal Anchorage Maxillary Expansion SAME

1.     Hybrid – TAD and attachment to teeth

2.     Bone bourne – no contact with teeth


Which is better

·      Stress of dentition with both types Finite analysis Lee 2014

·      BB significant less stress on the buccal plate, however hybrid stress on buccal plate Seong 2018

·      Comparison of RME, hybrid and BB Oh 2019

o   Suture opening at ANS: greater with hybrid 4.5mm, BB 2.8mm, RMA 1.2

o   Molar expansion: Greater with yybrid 6.3mm, RME 5.1, bb 3.5

o   Molar tipping: Greater with RME 4 degrees, Hybrid and BB 2 degrees

·      BB Vs RME Lin 2015

o   Skeletal expansion: BB 1mm more than RME

o   Molar tipping: BB less tipping 3 degrees

·      4 banded RME Vs 2 band hybrid appliance Toklu 2015

o   Molar expansion: No difference

o   Bone bending at 6s

§   3 degrees = no difference RME Vs hybrid

o   Molar tipping = no difference

o   1st premolar tipping = RME 2.5 degrees Vs 0.5 hybrid

·      Hybrid Vs RME Jai 2021

o   Skeletal opening: Greater with hybrid  (3.8mm Vs 2.3mm)

o   Molar expansion: No difference (RME 7mm Vs 6.3mm hybrid)

o   Molar tipping: Hybrid less tipping  (6.7 degrees Vs 3.8)

·      BB Vs RME Celank-Koca 2019

o   Molar expansion: No difference (4.2 RME Vs 4.5 BB)

o   Sutural opening: BB greater (3.1 BB Vs 1.1 RME)

·      Arruda / Kim study BB Vs Hybrid

o   Expansion dental Vs Skeletal = 40%


Overall changes


·      RME Jai 2021

o   Expansion dental = 7mm (6-6)

o   Skeletal changes 2.2mm (6-6)

§  Ratio skeletal:dental = 31%

o   Tipping 5-6 degrees of molars

·      Hybrid Moon 2020

o   Expansion dental 5mm

o   Skeletal expansion 2.45

§  Ratio skeletal: dental 50% (OTHER studies 28%)

o   Tipping 2.4 degrees

·      BB Lin 2015

o   Expansion 3.4mm

o   Skeletal 1.87mm

§  Ratio skeletal:dental 54%

o   Tipping 1.15


Difference in changes possibly due to number of TADs, technique


Systematic review BB Vs RME Crusi 2019

·      Conclusion

o   No difference in dental expansion

o   BB greater skeletal expansion = 2mm greater (6-6 level)

o   Hybrid = less tipping than RME


Clinical questions to ask when expanding


What is the purpose of expansion?

·      Correct crossbite OR expand midface


End point of expansion?

·      Molar correction

·      Achieving skeletal expansion = for 2mm require 5mm dental expansion


Limitations = studies based on younger patients


Adult patients with MSE Kangvonkit

·      Skeletal expansion 4.6mm

·      Soft tissue changes

o   Alar base increased 2mm


Issues with skeletal expansion

·      Different vertical heights of TADs = asymmetric expansion

·      30% of skeletal expansion = asymmetric Kim 2019

o   Issue is up to 2mm of vertical discrepancy also occurs = Cant


How to manage cases

·      Normal molar angle + thin alveolar bone

o   BB – maximise skeletal changes

·      Normal molar angle + normal bone

o   Hybrid / BB

·      Tipped molars

o   BB

·      Palatally tipped molars

o   RME, hybrid, BB


Does it matter

·      Younger patients = probably not

·      Adult patients = consider skeletal anchorage


Join the discussion

More from this show